As with most bureaucratic mumbo jumbo, the meaning of Joe Biden’s new EPA mandate is less than clear. I’ll translate: If you like your current gas-powered car, SUV or truck, too bad.
Hybrids vs. electric vehicles: Why hybrids are surging past EV sales
While electric vehicles have been the focus for many around the car industry in recent years, hybrid vehicles are stealing the spotlight in 2024.
Scripps News
In 2013, then-President Barack Obama earned himself the “lie of the year” after he had repeatedly assured Americans, “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it.”
That simply wasn’t true, and the rollout of Obamacare (Affordable Care Act) caused millions of people to receive cancellation notices. The government’s intrusion into the private health insurance market had major consequences, and many Americans weren’t happy about it.
More than 10 years later, President Joe Biden is driving major disruptions in another major U.S. industry: automobiles.
Unlike his former boss, Biden’s not even bothering to promise the American people that if they like their car, they can keep it.
Biden, however, also is not being upfront with the public about what his new Environmental Protection Agency rule actually means.
The headline announcing the EPA mandate last month proclaims: “Biden-Harris Administration finalizes strongest-ever pollution standards for cars that position U.S. companies and workers to lead the clean vehicle future, protect public health, address the climate crisis, save drivers money.”
As with most bureaucratic mumbo jumbo, the meaning is less than clear. I’ll translate: If you like your current gas-powered car, SUV or truck, too bad.
Liberals’ bad economic ideas: High wages, 32-hour workweeks sound great – but there’s a steep price
What people want doesn’t play into Biden’s rules
The timing of this rule isn’t a coincidence. It allows Biden to claim a “win” on his promises to the climate change crowd months ahead of the presidential election.
And Biden needs all the help he can get.
Yet, the broader implications – if drivers fully understood them – aren’t likely to win the president a lot of fans.
Biden’s age is showing: Special counsel says Biden is ‘elderly man with a poor memory.’ And he’s the Democrats’ guy?
The final rule, which begins in earnest in 2027, demands that automakers quickly amp up production of electric vehicles. By 2032, the emissions standards dictate that roughly 70% of new vehicle sales be battery-powered electric or hybrids.
For comparison, EVs made up just under 8% of new car sales last year.
If automakers don’t fall in line, they risk hefty fines.
While the EPA doesn’t specifically call for EVs, the only way automakers could reach the new targets is with a major uptick in that technology.
It’s worth noting, too, that a switch to electric batteries is not a panacea for the climate. Mining and processing those materials take a toll ‒ something Biden ignores.
“There’s a huge amount of environmental impact of mining the lithium and copper and all the materials that go into it,” James Meigs, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the former editor of Popular Mechanics, told me. “So by the time that battery gets to your car it’s already responsible for a huge amount of carbon emissions.”
This mandate also comes at an awkward moment. People in the car market are not flocking to EVs, and sales are not meeting expectations.
Consumer interest in EVs has declined for four consecutive months, and the public remains concerned about a lack of charging infrastructure, the price and confusing tax credits. Even comparatively popular Teslas are in a slump.
Negative headlines don’t help, either.
When drivers in Chicago couldn’t keep their EV batteries charged during a deep freeze earlier this year, it didn’t instill confidence for those of us who live and drive in the Midwest.
Expect Trump to hammer Biden on EV mandate
Because…
This article was originally published by a www.usatoday.com . Read the Original article here. .