If Cincinnati wants to land a National Hockey League team, it could easily cost $2 billion or more, sports economists told The Enquirer.
Landing a team here won’t be easy – or cheap. And there’s plenty of skepticism swirling around the idea of the NHL coming to Cincinnati, a notion sparked by league Commissioner Gary Bettman disclosing on Feb. 2 that someone from the region had expressed interest in an expansion team.
“This is insane for a variety of reasons,” Victor Matheson, a sports economist with the College of Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, said. Ohio is not a “dream market” for the NHL and many expansion teams for the league in the past two decades, including the Columbus Blue Jackets, have only been “moderately successful,” he noted. He added the costs to bring the team to Cincinnati could also be prohibitive.
“It seems very unlikely that Cincinnati would be high on their list,” he said.
While the prospect of a new major sports franchise could rejuvenate local calls to replace Cincinnati’s rundown arena, Heritage Bank Center, so far city and other officials are noncommittal. And NHL officials didn’t name the party from Cincinnati that approached them.
Beyond skepticism, there’s also plain old cynicism: Is Cincinnati being used as a decoy to get some other city to bid higher, or to prod a city with an existing team to build a new arena to make sure their team doesn’t leave?
“This gives the NHL the ability to play good cop-bad cop. … I think that’s what’s really behind this,” said Moshe Lander, a sports economist with Concordia University in Montreal.
The buzz creates the perception that a team could bolt a hockey city if it can’t get money for upgrades. It also helps the NHL demand more for league expansion fees when it’s ready to add teams.
It’s a complicated prospect for the region, here are some pieces to consider:
Drop the puck (and a lot of bucks)!
Did we mention it’s expensive to launch a hockey franchise?
If Cincinnati wants to play, economists say there are two big pricey pieces to figure out first: The NHL will insist on a new arena that could seat 16,000 to 18,000 that could cost $1 billion on its own, and the NHL will want the new team owner(s) to pay a hefty expansion fee – which could also cost $1 billion (or more).
“You’re looking at somewhere around $1 billion, perhaps a little more, but no less than $800 million,” J.C. Bradbury, a sports economist at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, said.
As far as the stadium goes, economists say a $1 billion arena would cost $75 million a year in bond payments. Then there’s the debate over who would pay for it. Team owners in huge markets like New York City have covered major arena construction costs. But in smaller markets such as Cincinnati (with fewer fans), local governments typically get pressed to cover part of arena construction – from 50% to 100%, the economists interviewed by The Enquirer said.
A stadium might cost a little less in the Midwest, but local government is still going to be asked to take on tens of millions of dollars in costs.
“Gary Bettman has never found a city he didn’t like (for) a NHL team — provided that the city took him into an arena,” Andrew Zimbalist, a sports economist with Smith College in Northampton, Massachusetts, said.
Julie Calvert, president of Visit Cincy (formerly known as the Cincinnati USA Convention & Visitors Bureau), said no one in her office had talked with the NHL. She acknowledged that bringing the league to the region would require a new arena, which regional leaders aren’t even sure if they want to pursue at this time.
“There won’t be any NHL team without a new arena – and right now, we’re still discussing the merits of a new arena,” Calvert said.
Currently, the Cincinnati USA Regional Chamber is overseeing a study on a potential new arena.
Among local leaders hesitant about paying for a new arena: Mayor Aftab Pureval.
“There are a lot…
This article was originally published by a www.cincinnati.com . Read the Original article here. .